{"id":808,"date":"2009-11-19T20:39:43","date_gmt":"2009-11-19T10:39:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/thomaslgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/?p=808"},"modified":"2019-09-21T12:58:52","modified_gmt":"2019-09-21T02:58:52","slug":"so-you-want-proof-the-emission-trading-scheme-is-a-scam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/?p=808","title":{"rendered":"So you want proof the Emission Trading Scheme is a scam?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A leading world authority on sea levels, Dr Nils-Axel M\u00f6rner, past president (1999-2003) of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution, has slammed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports on sea levels, pointing out that he had been an expert reviewer for the IPCC in both 2000 and 2006 and when he read an IPCC report, \u201cit had 22 authors, but none of them\u2014none\u2014were sea-level specialists.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In an interview with EIR magazine on 6th June 2007, https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=W1PS9-oOfRw&amp;t=20s Dr M\u00f6rner pointed out that from 1992 to 2002, satellite data indicated no sea level rise at all: the graph \u201cwas a straight line \u2026 no trend whatsoever.\u201d Then in 2003, IPCC publications showed a 2.3 mm per year rising sea level trend, for the same data set! M\u00f6rner: \u201cthose people in the IPCC, choose Hong Kong, which has six tide gauges, and they choose the record of one, which gives 2.3 mm per year rise of sea level. Every geologist knows that that is a subsiding area. \u2026 That is terrible! As a matter of fact, it is a falsification of the data set.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A leading world authority on sea levels, Dr Nils-Axel M\u00f6rner, past president (1999-2003) of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution, has slammed the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports on sea levels, pointing out that he had been an expert reviewer for the IPCC in both 2000 and 2006 and &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/?p=808\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;So you want proof the Emission Trading Scheme is a scam?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-808","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general-interest"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/808","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=808"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/808\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24742,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/808\/revisions\/24742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=808"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=808"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=808"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}