![\"Scientific](\"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/10\/Scientific_Research_Fraud.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
JAMA just published a study that purportedly compared the rates of fetal malformations in mothers who got the COVID jab versus the fortunate ones who did not. In the study, they purposely:<\/p>\n
Doing the above (and propensity weighting the groups, which invites immense additional opportunity for chicanery), they happily arrived at the following conclusion:<\/p>\n
In this cohort study of pregnancies exposed to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in the first trimester, exposure was not associated with an increased risk of any major congenital malformations.<\/strong><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Problem: Thalidomide (yes, %$#$! thalidomide) and other major teratogens were not discovered to be toxic to babies\u2026 until they looked at all births,<\/strong> not just the live ones<\/strong>. Happened over and over, to the point that the WHO and EMA both emphasize the necessity of including prenatal losses in teratogenicity surveillance.<\/strong><\/p>\n
Description of \u201cThe Fake\u201d<\/p>\n
Recall one of the definitions of the famous Disinformation Playbook Tactic<\/a> called \u201cThe Fake:\u201d<\/p>\n
To evade these standards, some companies choose to manufacture counterfeit science\u2014planting ghostwritten articles in legitimate scientific journals, selectively publishing positive results while underreporting negative results, or commissioning scientific studies with flawed methodologies biased toward predetermined results<\/strong>. These methods undermine the scientific process\u2014and as our case studies show, they can have serious public health and safety consequences<\/em>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Did you get that last part? \u201cThese methods can have serious public health and safety consequences.\u201d You don\u2019t say. Like causing deaths to unborn babies and traumatizing women? I am so $%^# \u2019ing sick of this %$#, I want to scream (and punch a wall).<\/p>\n
My interpretation of this data, knowing how modern \u201cScience\u201d operates, is that \u201cthey\u201d know there has been a massive increase in congenital malformations among the vaccinated. Thus, the \u201cesteemed\u201d researchers (whores, sorry) were tasked with publishing a \u201cnegative study\u201d to counter the data emerging from around the world, thus making any assertion that Covid vaccines are teratogenic a \u201ccontroversial\u201d topic with conflicting data.\u201d<\/p>\n
Welcome to modern science, folks. Any doctor reading this who belongs to the AMA should be absolutely ashamed of themselves.<\/p>\n