{"id":61623,"date":"2025-09-21T17:37:58","date_gmt":"2025-09-21T07:37:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/?p=61623"},"modified":"2025-09-21T17:37:58","modified_gmt":"2025-09-21T07:37:58","slug":"covid-19-vaccine-recommendations-dropped-by-panel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/?p=61623","title":{"rendered":"COVID-19 vaccine recommendations dropped by panel"},"content":{"rendered":"

The new ACIP Committee has been delicately chipping away at the mRNA guidelines with archeological tools. Yesterday, they fired up the jackhammer. The Wall Street Journal ran the story under the intentionally confusing headline, \u201cCOVID-19 vaccine recommendations dropped by panel, shots won\u2019t require a prescription.<\/a><\/strong>\u201d<\/p>\n

The news was that the CDC\u2019s vaccine committee (called ACIP) met again yesterday for its second full day. They ultimately voted to further limit the covid mRNA shots, this time adding a requirement for \u201cshared clinical decision-making\u201d before anyone under 65 or not in a \u2018high-risk\u2019 group can get the shots. They nearly<\/em> voted to require a prescription, it was so<\/em> close, but that vote failed by a small margin.<\/p>\n

Corporate media and its pet experts were alarmed, worried, fretful, and terrified, squawking things like this is the end<\/em>, nobody\u2019s following the science<\/em>, and so forth and so on.<\/p>\n

But, apart from that, the meeting was a bloodbath<\/em> for the jabs. In the clip above, Pfizer and Moderna declined to respond<\/em> to a direct question from a committee member. Even worse, they were forced to sit through a several lengthy presentations by the newly formed \u201cVaccine Working Group\u201d about all the growing questions and problems over the jabs.<\/p>\n

\u201cBeyond antibody changes,\u201d one presenter began, \u201cthe vaccinations have also been linked to long-lasting shifts in cytokine profiles, with elevated inflammatory cytokine persistence for months. These immune alterations may contribute to an increased risk of recurrent infection in some individuals.\u201d<\/p>\n

That was just the first<\/em> bullet point.<\/p>\n

The Workgroup continued through problem after problem, discussing biodistribution<\/em> (it spreads all over the body, including into the brain), frameshifting<\/em> (it creates random \u2018nonsense\u2019 proteins), and implausibly high levels of DNA contamination<\/em>, including parts of a monkey virus (SV40), especially in the Pfizer shot.<\/p>\n

💉 Even more astonishing, following the meeting, the CDC itself<\/em> tweeted a very critical comment from Dr. Malone, questioning how the drugmakers can even tell the shots work.<\/em><\/p>\n

What Dr. Malone meant is that there is no agreed-upon measurement<\/em> \u2014like a specific antibody level\u2014 that reliably predicts whether a person \u201cis protected\u201d from covid, either in terms of bare infection or severe disease.<\/p>\n

Absent \u201cconsensus\u201d on even what proves protection exists, how can the drugmakers claim the shots produce<\/em> protection? Stop saying that.<\/em><\/p>\n

Malone was pointing out that pharma\u2019s claims of efficacy were only based on large-group statistical conclusions, rather than any hard-science-based \u2014i.e. measurable\u2014 biological effect. Whereas, most other vaccines do have established correlates of protection<\/em>\u2014 meaning that there are well-defined, measurable biological markers (often specific antibody levels) that can reliably predict immunity.<\/p>\n

Anyway, Malone had a solid point, and he made it well. But the more important development was that his point was then re-published by the official US government Twitter account for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And that wasn\u2019t all. The CDC also published a whole string of clips, the most recent including a clip of Dr. Retsef Levi<\/a> stating that, \u201cSub-clinical myocarditis can cause death<\/em>. It\u2019s proven. It\u2019s not questionable. Nevertheless, we are not talking about this with patients, and we are not stating that risk.\u201d<\/p>\n

They are prying the Overton Window open, inch by inch, one post at a time.<\/p>\n

You should see the crazed hysteria in the comments by the medical fetishists, who are mad as hornets<\/em> that their<\/em> beloved CDC is now being used to push all this anti-vaxx propaganda. Don\u2019t actually read the comments. There\u2019s no logic; the pro-vaxxers never try to rebut the claims on the merits; it\u2019s just name-calling and non-sequiters.<\/p>\n

Some may wonder why, with all these evident problems, the Committee didn\u2019t just withdraw authorization from the shots altogether? The short version is, this problem didn\u2019t develop in a day, and it won\u2019t be fixed in a day. The Committee appears to be carefully building an unassailable scientific record before pulling the plug. Still, every time they get a whack at the Pfizer pi\u00f1ata, they hit it a little harder.<\/p>\n

The clock is ticking, louder and louder.<\/p>\n

https:\/\/open.substack.com\/pub\/coffeeandcovid\/p\/unprescribed-saturday-september-20<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The new ACIP Committee has been delicately chipping away at the mRNA guidelines with archeological tools. Yesterday, they fired up the jackhammer. The Wall Street Journal ran the story under the intentionally confusing headline, \u201cCOVID-19 vaccine recommendations dropped by panel, shots won\u2019t require a prescription.\u201d The news was that the CDC\u2019s vaccine committee (called ACIP) … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “COVID-19 vaccine recommendations dropped by panel”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,6,133],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61623","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general-interest","category-health-tips","category-vaccines"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61623","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=61623"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61623\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61624,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61623\/revisions\/61624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=61623"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=61623"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=61623"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}