![\"ACIP](\"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/ACIP_Sept_2025.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Ages 6 Months to 64 Years: \u2019Individual Decision-Making\u2019<\/b><\/p>\n
All 12 members voted unanimously that for people ages 6 months through 64 years, COVID vaccination should be based on \u201cindividual-based decision making.\u201d<\/p>\n
The panel emphasized that the risk-benefit is \u201cmost favorable\u201d for people at higher risk of severe COVID and \u201clowest\u201d for healthy people.<\/p>\n
In other words, COVID shots remain recommended as a legitimate option, with no statement advising against them.<\/p>\n
Age 65 and Older: \u2019Shared Clinical Decision-Making\u2019<\/b><\/p>\n
For older adults (65 and up), ACIP moved away from its prior blanket recommendation that all seniors should get the vaccine.<\/p>\n
Now, the board says decisions should be made through \u201cshared clinical decision-making,\u201d meaning patients are told to consult their healthcare providers on whether to take the shot.<\/p>\n
But again\u2014no warning, no reversal, no acknowledgment of the gene-contaminated injections.<\/p>\n
COVID Shots Now Easier to Access\u2014No Prescription Required<\/b><\/p>\n
ACIP also considered whether states should require prescriptions for COVID shots.<\/p>\n
That vote split 6\u20136, with Chair Martin Kulldorff breaking the tie against the measure.<\/p>\n
The result?<\/p>\n
No prescriptions required.<\/p>\n
COVID shots remain open-access, widely available at pharmacies, and\u2014thanks to ACIP\u2019s recommendation\u2014still covered by insurance.<\/p>\n
A Hollow Pivot<\/b><\/p>\n
By softening its language for seniors and shifting younger age groups into \u201cindividual choice\u201d framing, ACIP creates the illusion of restraint.<\/p>\n
In reality, the panel kept COVID shots on the table for all Americans while burying the growing evidence of risk.
\nBottom Line<\/p>\n
ACIP had the power to do what the evidence demands\u2014recommend against COVID shots altogether.<\/p>\n
Instead, the board doubled down on keeping them in circulation.<\/p>\n
They ignored the 38,773 reported deaths and 1,666,646 adverse events in VAERS, sidestepped the Harvard Pilgrim HHS report proving that fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries are ever counted.<\/p>\n
Their new recommendations ignored the reality that these injections are contaminated with plasmid DNA carrying human gene segments capable of integrating into the human genome.<\/p>\n
Rather than warn the public, ACIP voted to keep the shots widely available, insurance-covered, and legitimized as \u201cindividual choice.\u201d<\/p>\n
It was a hollow pivot that preserved access, protected the pharmaceutical industry, and left Americans exposed to injections with no long-term safety testing for cancer, genetic damage, fertility harms, or immune collapse.<\/p>\n
When given the chance to finally draw a line, ACIP refused\u2014and in doing so, they chose silence over safety.<\/p>\n