![\"Damaged](\"http:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/06\/Damaged_DNA-300x178.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
A new study on sucralose\u2014a popular sugar-free sweetener that was put through 110 safety studies before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it in 1998\u2014finds the popular ingredient has toxicities that regulatory agencies must consider.<\/p>\n
New health and safety findings revealed in the study show sucralose, sometimes sold under the brand name Splenda, is \u201cgenotoxic,\u201d meaning it breaks up DNA. That\u2019s on top of other condemning evidence revealed in the study published May 29 in the\u00a0Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health<\/a>. Years of independent research into sucralose have dismantled many of the original claims made in its\u00a0food additive permit<\/a>.<\/p>\n How sucralose can damage DNA is a metabolic process. When the sweetener is digested, it forms a metabolite called sucralose-6-acetate. But the product itself has also been found to contain trace amounts of this chemical compound. Taken together, the results of this study and previous research implicate sucralose in a range of detrimental health issues.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is not acceptable. We can\u2019t have genotoxic compounds in our food supply,\u201d\u00a0Susan Schiffman, corresponding author of the study, told The Epoch Times. \u201cI think if it was presented to the FDA today, they would not approve it. The original claims made to the FDA just aren\u2019t true. I don\u2019t know how they missed it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n