![\"Dr](\"http:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/07\/Dr_-Peter_McCullough_Drops_Vax-300x188.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Dr. Thomas explained that he\u2019s dealt with vaccine side effects as a pediatrician and started witnessing the industry\u2019s harm two decades ago.<\/p>\n
He asks Peter, \u201cYou hadn\u2019t been, I don\u2019t think in your typical world, having to worry about that, and then all of a sudden, you try to do the right thing and what have you experienced and how have you handled that as somebody who was so at the top of your field?\u201d<\/p>\n
Dr. McCullough responds, \u201cI could tell you through the course of my career, my personal life, I never questioned vaccines. I assumed they were safe and effective; it wasn\u2019t my area of research.<\/p>\n
And when I was asked to support a vaccine, like the 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine in adult medicine, I did so. Or when I was asked to take the influenza vaccine, I did so, but since all of this has happened, Paul, I\u2019ve actually called to question even those vaccines.<\/p>\n
And on my Twitter feed, @P_McCulloughMD, I just present the data, the publications. The vaccine efficacy for the 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine, in terms of protection against hospitalization and death, is 9%, Paul. Nine!\u201d<\/p>\n
Chuckling at the figure, Dr. Thomas states, \u201cI am not surprised by that. The strains have changed anyway.\u201d<\/p>\n
Well, actually, as explained by Dr. McCullough, \u201cThat\u2019s even through the period of time when it should have covered.\u201d<\/p>\n
He then moves on to the less-than-desirable results of the flu vaccine.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe vaccine efficacy for this year\u2019s influenza vaccine, which I took last year, 16%, Paul.\u201d<\/p>\n
Abysmal results. Now, what is the conventional standard for calling something a vaccine? Dr. McCullough breaks it down.<\/p>\n
\u201cStandard conventional acceptance criteria, something that would be acceptable that you would actually consider [recommending or taking], would be at least 50% vaccine efficacy and should last at least a year.<\/p>\n
So these are nowhere close to being acceptable products in modern medicine. And those are just two that people would consider uncontroversial, but you know, what? Doctors\u2019 lives and our knowledge and our analyses of things change as the science changes, and based on those contemporary results, I\u2019m dropping them! They\u2019re no longer supportable to me, for my practice for myself.\u201d<\/p>\n
Great to see Dr. McCullough coming around to this issue. To see the full interview, follow the link below.<\/p>\n