This morning I received a newsletter from Steve Kirsch talking about how yet another analysis (that’s 9 now) computes the VAERS numbers of 20,000 dead post jab are probably underreported by a factor of 20.<\/p>\n
I don’t know how these analysts are getting their numbers. I quote from a full article I posted here https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/?p=31877 on 2nd Feb 2021:<\/p>\n
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gave Harvard Medical School a $1 million dollar grant to track VAERS reporting at Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare for 3 years and to create an automated reporting system which would revolutionize the VAERS reporting system- transforming it from \u201cpassive\u201d to \u201cactive.\u201d It found, “Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. [\u2026] Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.”<\/p>\n
ONE PER CENT of vaccine reactions are reported! So if 20,000 deaths are reported that more likely puts the true figure at 100 times that or 2,000,000 deaths post jab.<\/p>\n
These are not figures from a wild-eyed conspiracy theorist or wacko nut-job. These are figures from an NIH paid for study conducted by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare. Could not get much more main-stream than that!<\/p>\n
So, why are the CDC, the FDA and Congress refusing to acknowledge the risks from the present jab? Maybe Upton Sinclair was spot on the money when he said:<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.\u201d Upton Sinclair<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This morning I received a newsletter from Steve Kirsch talking about how yet another analysis (that’s 9 now) computes the VAERS numbers of 20,000 dead post jab are probably underreported by a factor of 20. I don’t know how these analysts are getting their numbers. I quote from a full article I posted here https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/?p=31877 … <\/p>\n