![\"Microscope](\"http:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/Microscope_In_Lab-300x168.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
I just got off the phone with a woman who works at a large IVF clinic. She has to remain nameless to avoid being fired for speaking out. Nobody is supposed to know about the serious problems happening in the IVF clinics.<\/p>\n
Let me tell you what is really going on and the scientific study that explains it.<\/p>\n
Rest assured that the so-called \u201cfact checkers\u201d will call the IVF clinics who will deny there are any problems at all. \u201cNothing to see here folks, move along!\u201d<\/p>\n
So you\u2019ll have to decide who you want to believe here.<\/p>\n
It seems that they\u2019ve been having a series of problems starting in March, 2021 that they just cannot figure out and have never seen before. Although my informant believes it is the vaccine (which of course is why I got the call), she says that the PhD they employ there to investigate the problem is looking at \u201cevery possible variable\u201d to figure out why there was suddenly a doubling of the miscarriage rate (in March through May). Nothing was common to all these women. Nothing. She couldn\u2019t figure out the cause.<\/p>\n
The PhD never even considered the shots as a possible variable – she refused to look at it when it was mentioned as really the only environmental change for all their patients.\u00a0And because none of the other variables panned out as being a cause, she called the miscarriage increase a “fluke.”<\/strong><\/p>\n The IVF clinics start having problems starting in March. And they\u2019ve talked to other IVF clinics who are having similar problems.<\/p>\n The problems in Utah are document in this\u00a042-page report<\/a>\u00a0produced by HEALTH INDEPENDENCE ALLIANCE.<\/p>\n Here are a few highlights from the report:<\/p>\n Here is a sample of some of the problems they\u2019ve had. I\u2019ll add to this list over time as I get more data, but I wanted to share this with you now.<\/p>\n Note: they do\u00a0NOT<\/strong>\u00a0track the vaccination status of any of the women or men involved in the IVF process since they believe that the vaccines are safe and effective. I just wanted to point that out in case you were curious.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n They don\u2019t want to alarm anyone or discourage anyone from getting these \u201csafe and effective\u201d vaccines. It\u2019s all being discussed in private chat rooms between the IVF clinics. My informant would be fired if they found out who she was.<\/p>\n Finally, the embryologist at one clinic was heard saying \u201cAll the unvaxed deserve to die.\u201d Wow. You really can\u2019t make this stuff up.<\/p>\n I\u2019ve\u00a0written in the past<\/a>\u00a0about the famous\u00a0Singapore study<\/a>\u00a0that was deliberately gamed so that the conclusion (which determined the vaccines were dangerous to women) would not panic anyone.<\/p>\n Essentially, the vaccine creates antibodies that attack a protein (syncytin-1) which is essential for placenta formation.<\/p>\n In plain English, what they found is that the vaccine should be avoided if you are trying to have a baby.<\/strong><\/p>\n Here\u2019s what I originally wrote in July, 2021:<\/p>\n There is a substack article\u00a0What happened in Singapore<\/a>\u00a0showing the antibody response to syncytin-1 is\u00a0real and harmful<\/strong>. Mike Yeadon and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg raised an alarm in Item XI of their petition to halt the Covid vaccine in December that\u00a0it may induce an antibody response to syncytin-1<\/strong>, which is\u00a0essential for placenta formation<\/strong>. The Singapore study authors set up their study to \u201cdispel\u201d this insinuation. Brian Mowrey wrote the article to explain the testing system and why\u00a0the result the authors\u2019 study found is a giant warning that the fears they were trying to dispel are valid<\/strong>. In short there is a lot we do not know about the effects of the vaccines on reproductive health and what we know is troubling enough that they should not be recommended for anyone looking to have a baby.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Brian Mowrey\u2019s substack article was written on Jun 23, 2021, about a month after the Singapore study was published.<\/p>\n It\u2019s now December 15, 2021. There was only one person who commented on the article and 5 likes. That\u2019s why\u00a0nobody<\/strong>\u00a0knows about this. It\u2019s been suppressed.<\/p>\n So nobody is going to connect the dots here\u2026 unless they read my substack of course.<\/p>\n Just an addendum that it will be hard to get anyone mainstream to even read this article.<\/p>\n In my case, I\u2019d estimate that close to 90% of the people doing medical research that I know now refuse to talk to me because I don\u2019t think the vaccines are safe (so I must be an evil person). Around 5% agree with me. And there are 5% are in the middle who will talk to me about anything except the vaccines and masking. They do not want to even hear that they might be wrong. I suggested that they might want to check out my substack articles just so they can see what they have been missing, but I get a polite \u201cno thank you\u201d to my offer.<\/p>\n This is why the scientific community is so stuck on their beliefs. They basically are very proficient at filtering out any information that doesn\u2019t align with their beliefs.<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cdn.substack.com\/image\/fetch\/w_1100,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep\/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F51fff3c1-127c-48fb-a820-3165136e64f1_3000x2250.jpeg\")
<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/li>\nThe clinics are not bringing any of these problems to the public\u2019s attention<\/h3>\n
Some people who work at these clinics really don\u2019t like the unvaccinated<\/h3>\n
What happened in Singapore?<\/h3>\n
Expect \u201creal\u201d scientists to ignore your data if it doesn\u2019t comport with the mainstream narrative<\/h3>\n