![\"Ivermectin](\"http:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/Ivermectin_Tablets-300x169.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
In defending his reversal on the effectiveness of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19, he discussed his \u201cdifficult situation\u201d and said, \u201cI\u2019ve got this role where I\u2019m supposed to produce this paper and we\u2019re in a very difficult, delicate balance<\/span>.\u201d<\/p>\n The incident is recounted in Robert Kennedy Jr\u2019s New York Times Bestseller, The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the global war on Democracy and Public Health.<\/span><\/p>\n Andrew Hill, PhD, is a senior visiting Research Fellow in Pharmacology at Liverpool University. He is also an advisor for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Clinton Foundation. As a researcher for the WHO evaluating ivermectin, Hill wielded enormous influence over international guidance for the drug\u2019s use.<\/p>\n Hill had previously authored a analysis of ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that found the drug overwhelmingly effective.<\/p>\n On Jan. 6 of 2021, Hill testified enthusiastically before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidlelines Panel in support of ivermectin\u2019s use. Within a month, however, Hill found himself in what he describes as a \u201ctricky situation.\u201d Under pressure from his funding sponsors, Hill then published an unfavorable study. Ironically, he used the same sources as in the original study. Only the conclusions had changed.<\/p>\n