![\"10](\"http:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/11\/10_Flaws_In_PCR_Test-300x269.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.<\/p>\n
CONCLUSION<\/p>\n
The decision as to which test protocols are published and made widely available lies squarely in the hands of Eurosurveillance. A decision to recognise the errors apparent in the Corman-Drosten paper has the benefit to greatly minimise human cost and suffering going forward.<\/p>\n
Is it not in the best interest of Eurosurveillance to retract this paper? Our conclusion is clear. In the face of all the tremendous PCR-protocol design flaws and errors described here, we conclude: There is not much of a choice left in the framework of scientific integrity and responsibility.<\/p>\n
https:\/\/cormandrostenreview.com\/report\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In light of our re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless. CONCLUSION The decision as to which test protocols are published and made widely available lies squarely in the hands of Eurosurveillance. A decision … <\/p>\n