(David passed away on July 12th, 2020.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Preamble
\nThere is considerable scientific evidence that these diseases do not just have non-infectious co-factors, but that they are environmental in nature, not infectious.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In fact, with viruses, it is possible to question their very existence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The book \u201cThe Infectious Myth\u201d will investigate provide the scientific evidence that the normally accepted infectious cause is not, in fact, valid and, in will identify more plausible environmental causes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
From: https:\/\/theinfectiousmyth.com\/index2.php<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Specifics
\nThe COVID-19 scare that emanated from Wuhan, China in December of 2019 is an epidemic of testing, as the graph below with test statistics from Austria shows.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is no proof that a virus is being detected by the test and, while there should be, there is absolutely no concern about whether there are a significant number of false positives on the test. What is being published in medical journals is not science, every paper has the goal of enhancing the panic by interpreting the data only in ways that benefit the viral theory, even when the data is confusing or contradictory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In other words, the medical papers are propaganda.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But, despite this admission, earlier in the paper they repeatedly referred to the 41 cases (out of 59 similar cases) that tested positive for this RNA as, \u201c41 patients\u2026 confirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Another paper quietly admitted that:
\n\u201cour study does not fulfill Koch\u2019s postulates\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Koch\u2019s postulates, first stated by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the late 1800s, are simple logic, and can be stated as:
\n\u2022 Purify the pathogen (e.g. virus) from many cases with a particular illness.
\n\u2022 Expose susceptible animals (obviously not humans) to the pathogen.
\n\u2022 Verify that the same illness is produced.
\n\u2022 Some add that you should also re-purify the pathogen, just to be sure that it really is creating the illness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Famous virologist Thomas Rivers stated in a 1936 speech, \u201cIt is obvious that Koch’s postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That was a long time ago, but the problem continues. And Rivers\u2019 guidance was considered important enough to be cited by papers claiming (falsely) that Koch\u2019s Postulates had been met during the SARS era (2003). None of the papers referenced in this article have even attempted to purify the virus. And the word \u2018isolation\u2019 has been so debased by virologists it
\nmeans nothing (e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is \u2018isolation\u2019).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is lots of evidence that the virus is not as transmissible as is being implied. You can read the examples and more at:<\/p>\n\n\n\n