{"id":28421,"date":"2020-07-02T21:49:00","date_gmt":"2020-07-02T11:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/?p=28421"},"modified":"2021-06-02T14:36:08","modified_gmt":"2021-06-02T04:36:08","slug":"covid-19-test-is-a-fraud","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/?p=28421","title":{"rendered":"Using the PCR Test for COVID-19 Detection Is A Fraud"},"content":{"rendered":"\r\n
\"COVID-19<\/figure>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Dave Rasnick has had exchanges with David Crowe about this, and concurs, \u201cTo my knowledge, they have not yet purified this virus.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

In a previous interview I did with him a few weeks ago, he said this, about PCR tests and the fallacies of thinking less is more, or smaller is better, or more \u201csensitive\u201d means more accurate:<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\u201cIt\u2019s like fingerprints.\u00a0 With PCR you\u2019re only looking at a small number of nucleotide.\u00a0 You\u2019re looking at a tiny segment of gene, like a fingerprint.\u00a0 When you have regular human fingerprints, they have to have points of confirmation.\u00a0 There are parts that are common to almost all fingerprints, and it\u2019s those generic parts in a Corona virus that the PCR test picks up.\u00a0 They can have partial loops but if you only took a few little samples of fingerprints you are going to come up with a lot of segments of RNA that we are not sure have anything to do with corona virus. They will still show up in PCR. You can get down to the levels where its biologically irrelevant and then amplify it a trillion-fold.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\u201cThe primers are what you know. We already know the strings of RNA for the Corona family, the regions that are stable. That\u2019s at one end. Then you look at the other end of the region, for all Corona viruses. The Chinese decided that there was a region in those stable areas that was unique to their Corona virus. You do PCR to see if that is true. If it is truly unique it would work. But they\u2019re using the SARS test because they don\u2019t really have one for the new virus.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\u201cSARS isn\u2019t the virus that stopped the world,\u201d I offer.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\u201cThat\u2019s right.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\u201cPCR for diagnosis is a big problem,\u201d he continues. \u201cWhen you have to amplify it these huge numbers of time, it\u2019s going to generate massive amounts of false positives. Again, I\u2019m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Crowe described a case in the literature of a woman who had been in contact with a suspect case of Corona (in Wuhan) they believed was the index case. \u201cShe was important to the supposed chain of infection because of this. They tested her 18 times, different parts of the body, like nose, throat\u2014different PCR tests. 18 different tests. And she tested negative every time. And then they\u2014because of her epidemiological connection with the other cases, they said: \u201cWe consider her infected. So, they had 18 negative tests and they said she was infected.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\u201cNow why was she important? Well there was only one other person who could have theoretically transmitted the virus if the original patient, outside the family was who they thought it was. But secondly, she had the same exact symptoms as everybody else. Right? So, four people in his family came down with fever and cough and headaches, fatigue and all these kinds of big symptoms. So, if she could get those symptoms without the virus, then you, you\u2019ve got to say, well, why couldn\u2019t everybody else\u2019s symptoms be explained by whatever she had? I mean, maybe they, they ate some bad seafood or something and so they all got sick, but it had nothing to do with the coronavirus. But because three out of the four, tested positive, then they were, they were all considered infected and out of the same paper.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Another interesting thing is that they did a lot of tests. The first person in the list of people tested, he was positive on three out of 11 tests. So again, they took nose and throat samples and you know, different methods and all this kind of stuff. And they got 11 separate tests and only three were positive. And of course, all you need to be considered infected is one positive test. They could test you 20 times and if you test positive once, then you\u2019re infected. So, a positive test is meaningful. A negative test. It\u2019s like, eh. Not so much.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

I asked Crowe what he thought Kary Mullis would say about this explosion of PCR insanity.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\u201cI\u2019m sad that he isn\u2019t here to defend his manufacturing technique,\u201d he said. \u201cKary did not invent a test. He invented a very powerful manufacturing technique that is being abused. What are the best applications for PCR? Not medical diagnostics. He knew that and he always said that.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

Our conversation went in many different directions and I plan to publish the entire audio interview. I asked David what he thought was happening here, at the most core level.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\u201cI don\u2019t think they understand what they\u2019re doing,\u201d he said. \u201cI think it\u2019s out of control. They don\u2019t know how to end this. This is what I think what happened: They have built a pandemic machine over many years and, and as you know, there was a pandemic exercise not long before this whole thing started.\u201d<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\u201cI just want to identify who sponsored that simulation conference, 6 weeks before the first news broke out of Wuhan,\u201d I interjected. \u201cIt was the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Johns Hopkins Center For Health Security, and the World Economic Forum. Incidentally, all the stats, projections and modeling you see in the media are coming out of Johns Hopkins.\u201d<\/p>\r\n

(Update June 2021 – Tom: I later learned this was untrue. Although their names were at the masthead as sponsors they never paid a penny. It was wholly funded by Open Philanthropy who got the money from Facebook.)<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

I went looking to verify the authenticity of the data in this meme and was blown away by the article I found. You will find it a fascinating read!<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n

\r\n
https:\/\/uncoverdc.com\/2020\/04\/07\/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus\/<\/div>\r\n<\/figure>\r\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dave Rasnick has had exchanges with David Crowe about this, and concurs, \u201cTo my knowledge, they have not yet purified this virus.\u201d In a previous interview I did with him a few weeks ago, he said this, about PCR tests and the fallacies of thinking less is more, or smaller is better, or more \u201csensitive\u201d … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “Using the PCR Test for COVID-19 Detection Is A Fraud”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,6,133],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-28421","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general-interest","category-health-tips","category-vaccines"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28421","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=28421"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28421\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33514,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28421\/revisions\/33514"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=28421"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=28421"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=28421"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}