![\"Planes_Dropping_Chemtrails\"](\"http:\/\/www.tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/08\/Planes_Dropping_Chemtrails-300x169.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
In Brief<\/p>\n
The Facts:
\nGeoengineering (weather modification) is hitting the mainstream hard as a potential response to climate change. Congressional hearings and more are all taking place, but there is evidence to suggest that spraying has already been happening.<\/p>\n
Reflect On:
\nAll of the evidence showing it’s been happening for a long time. Are they really spraying to combat climate change, or could there be some other reason these programs are taking place? The article goes into more detail.<\/p>\n
Geoengineering is becoming a common term within the mainstream. We\u2019ve covered the topic many times over the past 10 years. The last article we wrote on the topic was about a Harvard Professor explaining how spraying heavy metals in the sky could possibly kill or contribute to the deaths of tens of thousands of people every single year. Prior to that, we wrote about an experiment at MIT where they were going to spray toxic particles into the sky to reflect the sunlight away from Earth, and before that, we covered the then CIA director\u2019s comments regarding his support for Geoengineering. This isn\u2019t a new phenomenon. Discussions about it have been ongoing for a very long time, and there are dozens of examples to choose from when conveying this information to the public.<\/p>\n
A Few Examples<\/p>\n
Here\u2019s a video of popular physicist Michio Kaku speaking on weather modification.<\/p>\n
A United States government document printed at the request of the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation in November of 1978 states:<\/p>\n
In addition to specific research programs sponsored by Federal agencies, there are other functions related to weather modification which are performed in several places in the executive branch. Various federal advisory panels and committees and their staffs \u2013 established to conduct in-depth studies and prepare comprehensive reports, to provide advice or recommendations, or to coordinate Federal weather modification programs \u2013 have been housed and supported within executive departments, agencies, or offices.<\/p>\n
A 1996 report conducted by top military personnel in the U.S, titled \u201cWeather as a Force Multiplier; Owning the Weather in 2025,\u201d reveals the supposed urgency to implement these programs:<\/p>\n
In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.<\/p>\n
There is enormous evidence to suggest that these programs have already been operational for years:<\/p>\n
\u201cIn recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.\u201d \u2013 World Meteorological Association (source)<\/p>\n
The question is, have they really been spraying to combat global warming? And if so, why didn\u2019t they just tell us?<\/p>\n
International Community Speaks Out<\/p>\n
The international community has spoken out against weather modification. Several global politicians, like Hugo Chavez, have also accused the United States of using weather manipulation for warfare purposes, specifically referencing the Haiti Earthquake.<\/p>\n
HRH Princess Basmah Bint Saud said geoengineering is the west\u2019s \u201cweapon of mass destruction.\u201d<\/p>\n
So, as you can see, this has been an issue for a while. Unfortunately, it\u2019s doesn\u2019t really become an \u2018issue\u2019 until it\u2019s presented within the mainstream. Now, that\u2019s exactly what\u2019s happening.<\/p>\n