That headline HAS to be the biggest lie I have ever typed.<\/p>\n
NOTHING could be further from the truth. The pro-vaccine proponents are often authoritarian, aggressive, rude and invalidative, deriding as \u201cunscientific\u201d any who have reservations about or personal experience contradicting the safety and efficacy of vaccines charade.<\/p>\n Any but official sources are denigrated and dismissed as unreliable. Justices of the US Supreme Court stated in 1988 that vaccines were \u201cunavoidably unsafe\u201d. \u201cThe only safe vaccine is one that is never used.\u201d \u2013 Dr. James A. Shannon, MD, former director of the National Institutes of Health (1955-1968) \u201cThere is no evidence that any influenza vaccine thus far developed is effective in preventing or mitigating any attack of influenza. The producers of these vaccines know that they are worthless, but they go on selling them anyway.\u201d \u2013 Dr. J. Anthony Morris, formerly Chief Vaccine Control Officer at the FDA<\/p>\n In actual fact, vaccines are the opposite of effective! Vaccinations reduce the ability of the body to fight infection. \u201cseasonal flu vaccination almost doubled the risk of infection with pandemic flu.\u201d http:\/\/www.cbc.ca\/news\/health\/flu-vaccine-paradox-adds-to-public-health-debate-1.2912790<\/a> 1. The vast majority of people correctly perceive that most politicians lie. So a lying politicians does not want a population that can tell truth from lies. The politicians erroneously believe they are best served by a blindly obedient, non-questioning, ignorant population. (To see how they brought this about, read \u201cThe Deliberate Dumbing Down of America\u201d by Charlotte Iserbyt http:\/\/www.deliberatedumbingdown.com\/<\/a>)<\/p>\n 2. Drug companies make money by selling drugs. There is no profit for them in a healthy, disease free population. Let that sink in for a moment. There is no profit for them in a healthy, disease free population. Therefore, the longer a person is on drugs, the more the drug company makes in profit. They do not make money by curing people. They make money by inventing drugs that merely suppress symptoms but do not cure disease. They make the most money by creating perpetual customers. People who are drugged from the cradle to the grave. That is their ideal scene. A lifelong customer. That headline HAS to be the biggest lie I have ever typed. NOTHING could be further from the truth. From observation and reasoning, most of the people I see commenting on the vaccine debate fall into one of several groups. 1. Those who truly believe that vaccines do more good than harm. 2. Those who … <\/p>\n
\nFrom observation and reasoning, most of the people I see commenting on the vaccine debate fall into one of several groups.
\n1. Those who truly believe that vaccines do more good than harm.
\n2. Those who are defending their decision to vaccinate their children because they can\u2019t be wrong.
\n3. The paid shills of the drug companies.
\n4. Those who blindly and unquestioningly believe authority.
\n5. Those who have done enough homework to realise that the truth about the negative consequences of vaccines is being suppressed so hold grave doubts that all we are being told is true.
\n6. Those who are closely connected to someone who has been adversely impacted upon or killed by vaccines.
\n7. Those who have direct personal knowledge of the harm caused by ingredients in vaccines.
\n8. Those who of the opinion that vaccines do more harm than good.
\n9. As well, there are those who do not comment, some of whom are interested in acquiring data.
\nI will address most specifically the members of groups 1 and 9 with this article.
\nThe members of the second, third and fourth groups I will not address as there is no point. Their mind is made up and the facts are not needed. Most pro=vaccine commenters should be in debating teams. They are not there to learn or discuss, they comment to push the vaccine agenda, repeating as solid fact statements proven to be lies, even by their own sources! regardless of the data contradicting their Contrary data would only engender a potential confusion and non-rational defense in groups 2 and 4. The members of group 3 accept money in an effort to advance the cause of that which harms people. They are criminals.
\nThe other groups 4-7 listed above I don\u2019t need to address, they know. They might get some talking points from this article or may wish to share it or link to it at: http:\/\/tomgrimshaw.com\/tomsblog\/2017\/05\/16\/vaccines-are-safe-effective-do-not-cause-autism-and-are-made-by-companies-most-interested-in-your-health\/<\/a>
\nI hope this post will provide enough solid facts to those who have an desire to learn the unbiased truth. Those who are confused by the directly opposing stances, both of which cannot be true.
\nIt will not change one iota of conviction, authoritarian bombast or vested interest bias in those blind to obeservation. From them it will elicit howling condemnation and vitriolic criticism. For so it should. It threatens their cherished lies or vested interest cash cow by providing evidence from \u201ctheir side of the fence\u201c that they are attempting to herd us 180 degrees in the wrong direction.
\nOn the comments posted at https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=o3P6wVUH0pc&t=4s<\/a> I have seen some outrageous untruths promoted forcefully as gospel.
\nFor instance that vaccines are safe, effective and do not cause autism.
\nThis is in direct contradiction of incontrovertible facts.<\/p>\nBursting the The Peer Review Bubble<\/h2>\n
\nAnything but a peer reviewed article is similarly scorned. That notwithstanding a UK survey which found fully a third of researchers admitted to skewing results in favour of the organisation funding the research. And major publishers of peer-reviewed articles have had to retract a large number of articles. (Do an on-line search for \u201cjournal retracts articles\u201d.)
\nDirect observation (when a mother observes that her baby died within 24 hours of receiving vaccinations) is scorned as \u201canecdotal\u201d in favour of \u201cpeer-reviewed\u201d and \u201cdouble-blind\u201d clinical trials by the denizens of scientific and clinical laboratories.
\nThis site http:\/\/journals.plos.org\/plosone\/article?id=10.1371\/journal.pone.0005738<\/a> documents a meta-analysis of researchers and found fully a third admitted to questionable research practices and 72% observed questionable research practices in others. A quote from the site:
\n\u201cA pooled weighted average of 1.97% (N?=?7, 95%CI: 0.86\u20134.45) of scientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified data or results at least once \u2013a serious form of misconduct by any standard\u2013 and up to 33.7% admitted other questionable research practices. In surveys asking about the behaviour of colleagues, admission rates were 14.12% (N?=?12, 95% CI: 9.91\u201319.72) for falsification, and up to 72% for other questionable research practices. Meta-regression showed that self reports surveys, surveys using the words \u201cfalsification\u201d or \u201cfabrication\u201d, and mailed surveys yielded lower percentages of misconduct. When these factors were controlled for, misconduct was reported more frequently by medical\/pharmacological researchers than others.
\nConsidering that these surveys ask sensitive questions and have other limitations, it appears likely that this is a conservative estimate of the true prevalence of scientific misconduct.<\/b>\u201d
\nSo I take \u201cpeer-reviewed\u201c research with more than a grain of salt and value it far less than direct obvservation.
\nAnd listen to what two of the top people most closely connected to peer-reviewed lies have to say about \u201cpeer-review\u201d.
\n\u201cPeer review is a flawed process, full of easily identified defects with little evidence that it works.\u201d Richard Smith, past editor of the British Medical Journal and chief executive of the BMJ Publishing Group for 13 years. https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC1420798\/<\/a>
\n\u201cIt is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.\u201d Marcia Angell, former Editor-in-Chief of the NEJM. http:\/\/www.bmj.com\/content\/346\/bmj.f3830\/rr\/652673<\/a>
\nIn truth the overseers of the peer-reviewers have found the emporer has no clothes! When a vaccine advocate looks down their sanctimoneous nose at the mention of studies that are not peer-reviewed, recognise that their arrogance is based on ignorance.<\/p>\nWho Says Vaccines Are Safe? Not These People.<\/h2>\n
\n https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/10pdf\/09-152.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n
\n\u201cVaccines are highly dangerous, have never been adequately studied or proven to be effective, and have a poor risk\/reward ratio….The treatment of cancer and degenerative diseases is a national scandal. The sooner you learn this, the better off you will be.\u201d \u2013 Dr. Allen Greenberg, MD
\n\u201cI found the whole vaccine business was indeed a gigantic hoax. Most doctors are convinced that they are useful, but if you look at the proper statistics and study the instances of these diseases you will realize that this is not so.\u201d \u2013 Dr. Archivides Kalokerinos, MD
\n\u201cIn my medical career I\u2019ve treated vaccinated and unvaccinated children and the unvaccinated children are far healthier than the vaccinated ones.\u201d \u2013 Dr. Philip Incao, MD. This \u201canecdotal\u201d observation has recently been validated by a survey of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children.
\n\u201cWith regard to acute and chronic conditions, vaccinated children were significantly less likely than the unvaccinated to have had chickenpox and pertussis but, contrary to expectation, were significantly more likely to have been diagnosed with otitis media, pneumonia, allergic rhinitis, eczema, and NDD. The vaccinated were also more likely to have used antibiotics, allergy and fever medications; to have been fitted with ventilation ear tubes; visited a doctor for a health issue in the previous year, and been hospitalized. The reason for hospitalization and the age of the child at the time were not determined, but the latter finding appears consistent with a study of 38,801 reports to the VAERS of infants who were hospitalized or had died after receiving vaccinations. The study reported a linear relationship between the number of vaccine doses administered at one time and the rate of hospitalization and death; moreover, the younger the infant at the time of vaccination, the higher was the rate of hospitalization and death [55]. The hospitalization rate increased from 11% for 2 vaccine doses to 23.5% for 8 doses (r2 = 0.91), while the case fatality rate increased significantly from 3.6% for those receiving from 1-4 doses to 5.4% for those receiving from 5-8 doses.\u201c –
\nPretty horrific results!
\n http:\/\/oatext.com\/Pilot-comparative-study-on-the-health-of-vaccinated-and-unvaccinated-6-to-12-year-old-U.S.-children.php<\/a>
\n\u201cThere is no scientific evidence that vaccinations are of any benefit, but it is clear that they cause a great deal of harm.\u201d \u2013 Dr. Gerhard Buchwald, MD
\n\u201cOnly after realizing that routine immunizations were dangerous did I achieve a substantial drop in infant death rates.\u201d \u2013 Dr. Archivides Kalokerinos, MD
\n\u201cI once believed in Jenner; I once believed in Pasteur. I believed in vaccination. I believed in vivisection. But I changed my views as the result of hard thinking.\u201d \u2013 Dr. Walter Hadwen, MD, LSA, MRCS, LRCP, MB, BS, BSc
\nSo they are NOT safe!<\/u><\/b>
\nThe National Vaccine Compensation Program in the US has paid out just shy of 2.6 billion dollars as a result of vaccine injuries.
\nI was not able to access the official site but some out dated statistics are here:
\n https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/books\/NBK236419\/<\/a>
\nAgain, they are NOT safe!
\nThe CDC has admitted that between 1955\u20131963 over 98 million Americans received one or more doses of a polio shot which was contaminated with a cancer-causing virus called Simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40). The CDC quickly took down the page but the site was luckily cached and saved to symbolize this grand admission. And to believe that some people do not believe it could happen again!
\nTo further confirm this unbelievable admission, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago Dr. Michele Carbone has been able to independently verify the presence of the SV40 virus in tissue and bone samples from patients who died during that era. He found that 33% of the samples with osteosarcoma bone cancers, 40% of other bone cancers, and 60% of the mesothelioma\u2019s lung cancers all contained this obscure virus. This leaves the postulation that upwards of 10\u201330 million actually contracted and were adversely affected by this virus, to be deadly accurate.
\nTheir is a cached image of the CDC web page at this site:
\n http:\/\/www.vaccines.news\/2015-09-23-cdc-admits-98-million-americans-were-given-cancer-virus-via-the-polio-shot.html<\/a>
\nThey have NOT been safe for a VERY long time!
\nDr Wakefield investigated the safety studies of the MMR vaccine and found them woefully inadequate. That and his observation of the regression of children after the vaccine led him to publish his 280 page study which ignited the fuse of the vaccination debate in the UK. Here is an interview with him and links to the 28 other studies from around the world that support Dr. Wakefield\u2019s controversial findings: http:\/\/articles.mercola.com\/sites\/articles\/archive\/2010\/04\/10\/wakefield-interview.aspx<\/a>
\nSo the lie that Wakefield was a fraud and no other studies have replicated his findings can be put to bed as just that, a blatant lie.
\nThe Center for Disease Control covered up for years the fact that their studies revealed autism increased in African American boys by 236% after vaccination. Here\u2019s a link to the whistle blower interview:
\n https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=q62DcaNs_0M&t=58s<\/a>
\nand the result of it:
\n https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=p-sWZx6DOMM<\/a>
\nSo vaccines DO cause autism to children.
\nThe flu shot during a pregnant woman\u2019s first trimester increases the autism rate in the child by 20%.
\n https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/27893896<\/a>
\nAppeared in the JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association.
\nSo they DO cause autism to children, even when administered to their mother!
\nThe flu vaccine has the most adverse reactions attributed to it. Look here for some of the side effects:
\n https:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/vaccines\/vac-gen\/side-effects.htm<\/a>
\nDr High Fudenberg found 10 times the risk of developing Alzheimer\u2019s disease in those over 55 years old who received the flu vaccine 5 years in a row. According to Dr. Fudenberg, one of the world\u2019s most prolific immunologists and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (over 600 papers in peer review journals), he had this to say regarding the annual flu vaccine program: \u201cIf an individual has had 5 consecutive flu shots between 1970-1980 (the years of the study) his \/ her chance of developing Alzheimer\u2019s Disease is 10 times greater than if they had one, two or no shots.\u201c When asked for the reason why this is so, Dr Fudenberg stated that, \u201cIt is due to the mercury and aluminium buildup that is in every flu shot. The gradual mercury and aluminium buildup in the brain casues cognitive dysfunction.\u201d
\nSo, the aluminium in vaccines cause Alzheimer\u2019s Disease too.
\nAnd for the final word on vaccine safety, pick up a vaccine insert to see what the manufacturer lists as possible side effects. From stomach upset to paralysis and death. That is probably the most truth you will ever get from a drug company!<\/p>\nVaccines Are Effective<\/h2>\n
\n\u201cThere is insufficient evidence to support routine vaccination of healthy persons of any age.\u201d \u2013 Dr. Paul Frame, MD, Journal of Family Practice
\n\u201cWe are taught by the authorities that vaccines protect us against eventual aggressive viruses and microbes, and, therefore, prevent contagious illnesses and epidemics. This lie has been perpetuated for 150 years despite the ineffectiveness of vaccines in protecting against illnesses.\u201d \u2013 Dr. Guylaine Lanctot, MD
\n\u201cI\u2019ll talk about vaccines. Number one, vaccines make people sick. They don\u2019t work. They don\u2019t protect. The use of vaccines is totally wrong! It\u2019s perfect nonsense based on fear. They are dangerous. One child out of five has overwhelming disabilities from vaccines \u2013 nuerological problems, seizures. I\u2019ve got a whole list. There are plenty of books on this subject. Doctors don\u2019t even read about this.\u201d Interview with Dr. Guylaine Lanctot, MD
\n\u201cDuring those 30 years I have run against so many histories of little children who had never seen a sick day until they were vaccinated and who, in the several years that have followed, have never seen a well day since. I couldn\u2019t put my finger on the disease they have. They just weren\u2019t strong. Their resistance was gone. They were perfectly well before they were vaccinated. They have never been well since.\u201d \u2013 Dr. William Howard Hay, MD
\n\u201cThe greatest threat of childhood diseases lies in the dangerous and ineffectual efforts made to prevent them through mass immunization….There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease.\u201d \u2013 Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, MD, Author
\nFour Sanger middle-school students have chickenpox \u2013 and they had been fully vaccinated.
\n http:\/\/www.fresnobee.com\/news\/local\/article149719654.html<\/a>
\nSo vaccinations do not confer guaranteed immunity.
\n\u201cThere is a great deal of evidence to prove that immunization of children does more harm than good.\u201d—Dr. J. Anthony Morris, former Chief Vaccine Control Officer and research virologist, US FDA<\/p>\nWho You Gonna Trust? A Lesson In Logic<\/h2>\n
\n3. To accomplish this highly profitable result the drug companies will stoop to anything and stop at nothing. From withholding or altering death rates during drug trials, to the depravity of promoting deadly destructive \u201csolutions\u201d and lying that they help. For instance the Paxil antidepressant that increases the suicide rate by 800%. The courts have convicted the drug companies and fined them billions, yes, billions for all sorts of immoral and illegal activity (bribery, off-label marketing, keeping deadly drugs on the market), all in the name of profit.
\nSo we have established their ethic level is criminal and motivation is money. Above any consideration of ethics. Agreed?
\n4. The executives who perpetuate these crimes against humanity are never brought to personal justice. The company pays the fine. And as the fine is far less than the profit made, even by doing the wrong thing, the company profits. And as the directors are legally obliged to make as much money as they can for the company, there is no disincentive to the directors in doing the wrong thing. (Watch the documentary The Corporation https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=Y888wVY5hzw&t=314s<\/a>)
\n5. But these drug companies (run by the very same, aforementioned, lying, cheating, bribing, research twisting unethical executives) say they have a \u201csolution\u201d to prevent disease – vaccination. The government, composed of lying politicians, buy this unproven solution from proven liars and want to force it on us.
\nAnd we believe this?
\nAs Mr Spock would say, \u201cThat is highly illogical!\u201d
\nThe Yanks have a saying, \u201cBurn me once, shame on you. Burn me twice, shame on me.\u201d
\nIn the subject of vaccines the public have been burned so many times they are looking individually like Roman candles and collectively like a raging forest fire!
\nAnd if you want to take it further, ask Google about the link between the protein in vaccinations called Nagalase and how it suppresses the body\u2019s ability to make\/absorb vitamin D and how that increases the cancer risk. Here\u2019s one link:
\n http:\/\/drjockers.com\/how-vitamin-d-stops-cancer-stem-cells\/<\/a>
\nHere\u2019s to healthier children, not lifelong clients of big pharma.
\nTom Grimshaw<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"